Andy Lewis & Simon Singh discuss homeopathy & #ten23

Simon Singh (author of ‘Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial‘) and Andy Lewis discuss the homeopathy and the overdose event organised by the 10:23 campaign, on 30th January 2010 in Red Lion Square, Holborn, London.

Thanks to Dr Stephen Law of CFI UK for the footage

CFI also have an event on Saturday 6th March titled “Monsters vs Aliens“, featuring three experts on UFOs, the Loch Ness Monster and Sasquatch.



    Sceptical suicide attempt, nationwide: Updated

    10:23 logo

    At 10:23am on Saturday 30th January, over 300 individuals from branches of Skeptics in the Pub will simultaneously consume an overdose of commercially available homeopathic medicines. The nationwide protest, organised by the 10:23 campaign from Merseyside Skeptics, will either unfold as one of the largest mass suicides since Jonestown, or will yet again confirm that science, evidence and rational thought actually do work.

    The confirmed locations of the overdoses are as follows:

    UK

    Birmingham: High Street

    Edinburgh: Secret Location

    Glasgow: Tie Rack in Central Station

    London: Conway Hall, Red Lion Square, Holborn

    Leeds: Leeds Mainline Rail Station, main entrance at 9.30-10 am

    Australia
    Sydney: Queen Victoria Building, York and Druitt Street
    USA
    Portland, Orgeon

    Immediately after the protest, Dr Simon Singh, Prof. John Garrow and Andy Lewis will take to the stage of London’s Conway Hall for Trick or Treatment: Alternative Medicine on Trial, the first event in 2010 from CFI UK.

    The protest, comes after a Boots representative, Paul Bennett, attracted ridicule from the national press after admitting to a parliamentary select committee last month that Boots knowingly sells homeopathic remedies to the public for which it has no evidence of effectiveness. The Science and Technology Select Committee are due to release their report on homeopathy around the time of the protest, at the end of January.

    While dispensing sugar pills may seem harmless, in reality the endorsement of homeopathic potions by leading health providers can have grave consequences. As well as potentially undermining trust in medicine and medical advice, customers may be misled into believing that they are treating their illness – for example a Panorama investigation famously revealed that homeopaths were advising customers to take ineffective pills in place of Malaria prophylactics on holiday. In extreme cases, such as the ‘healing therapist’ Russell Jenkins, deaths may occur.

    The 10:23 Campaign, so named in recognition of
    Avogadro’s Constant (the limit of dilution which is exceeded by homeopathic preparations) aims to raise awareness of homeopathy and its basis within long-discredited 18th century pseudoscience, selling remedies to the public which have no scientific basis and no credible evidence for its efficacy beyond the placebo effect.

    As ever, this is an excellent opportunity to demonstrate JREF’s Law (namely ”there is no topic of parapsychological discussion upon which James Randi has failed to comment”) by directing attention to Randi’s lecture at Princeton in 2001, which contained the following segment on homeopathy. Randi’s commentary in 2002 for the BBC is worth reading also.

      Foals for Goals: Horse placenta the new magic sponge?

      As an avid football fan and someone who has sustained their fair share of injuries, I have often been jealous of professional footballers who have unlimited access to the best medical treatment money can buy.  Having just spent a number of months on the NHS waiting list for key hole surgery on my knee I am always a little jealous when a footballer who has been injured that day is able to go for a scan that evening and if necessary have a surgery the following day, and then be treated to the best possible after care and rehabilitation available to them.  Yet despite access to world renowned surgeons, the best physiotherapists, and world class medical facilities it appears that this is not enough for some footballers, who feel that they can get better treatment elsewhere. Continue reading

        Homeopathy from the NHS?

        Should homeopathy be included on the NHS? Most of us would say no, simply because we do not believe the evidence supports the basis on which homeopathy is claimed to work. “Like cures like” is possible enough – indeed, it sounds very similar to the basis on which working vaccines to diseases like flu are created. But the process of diluting – succussing – homeopathic remedies that progressively removes more and more of the original active substance from the sugar pill/water/alcohol substrate clearly is at odds with everything we know about how chemistry works. Continue reading