The news this week that The Lancet has retracted Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 paper claiming to have found a link between autism and the MMR vaccine is satisfying in the sense that the mills of science may grind exceeding slow but they grind exceeding small. Science – the process of peer review, of establishing the truth by attempting to replicate results independently – works.
Continue reading
Author Archives: wendyg
Homeopathy from the NHS?
Should homeopathy be included on the NHS? Most of us would say no, simply because we do not believe the evidence supports the basis on which homeopathy is claimed to work. “Like cures like” is possible enough – indeed, it sounds very similar to the basis on which working vaccines to diseases like flu are created. But the process of diluting – succussing – homeopathic remedies that progressively removes more and more of the original active substance from the sugar pill/water/alcohol substrate clearly is at odds with everything we know about how chemistry works. Continue reading
B Premanand 1930 – 2009.
Basava Premanand was India’s leading skeptic and humanist; he published The Indian Skeptic and was a teacher, debunker,and performer.People compare him to James Randi, but it might actually be more appropriate to compare Randi to him.
I met him once, when Lewis Jones did an interview with him for The Skeptic. Seeing him was the same kind of mind-blowing experience that seeing Randi for the first time was. He *looked* like a guru; he performed the miracles that India’s gurus use to attract followers; and then he explained exactly what he’d done like Agatha Christie. Simply brilliant.
The thing that has always stuck in my mind from the interview was that he said that debunking miracles was very important in India because miracles are how religions/religious leaders sell themselves (with the implication that once they have sold themselves all kinds of exploitation become possible). This seems to me an important point to keep in mind when someone asks, “What harm can it do if people believe…?”
The Times did a pretty intelligent writeup of his work in 2003: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/article1152564.ece
And the BBC here, in 2004: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/this_world/3813469.stm
Premanand took a lot of risk in trenchantly opposing gurus he believed to be fraudulent. I hope among his many admierers are some who can carry on his work.
Wendy Grossman www.pelicancrossing.net