I had crohn's disease, it's been well proven in medical journals in the 1950s that eliminating sugar dairy and grains from the diet cures this terrible disease in 95% of cases by addressing the cause of the disease (those 3 toxic "food" groups).
So let me get this straight, you're telling me that being on low dose chemotherapy (87.5 mg/day) for life to "treat" the disease as doctors prescribed me (and I was stupid enough to beleive for 6 years) which causes other side effects and diseases is a better option than simply eliminating the cause of the disease which was my highly toxic diet?
Is that really what you beleive? That a "band aid" solution like chemo with terrible side effects is better than getting rid of the cause of the disease whcih is poor diet? If you really think chemo is a better option, you have serious issues.
Let's compare the results:
With chemo: The crohn's disease continues to progress and cause excrutiating pain, the chemo itself only slightly masks the symptoms and causes other diseases at the same time while sending my cancer risk through the roof, dramatically reducing my lifespan.
With diet: The cause of the crohn's is eliminated, the disease dissapears, and I can lead a normal, long and healthy life
To anyone with a functional brain between their ears, the right option is obvious, but I'm sure you'll manage to find some insane reason how chemotherapy is better because it's "proven" or some other nonsense.
By the way, I've been on a healthy diet and off chemo for a year now, I've never felt better and doctors can't find a trace of crohn's in me.